It seems that we're all guessing a bit. So, the old saw, RTFM might apply.
I was not overly impressed with the results you achieved, Bill, While there was definite improvement, I saw a test made by someone else using a 600mm lens, and the differences between using the lens with/without SR seemed greater than in your series. However, regardless of the degree of difference, it's clear that the feature _does_ work. Shel > [Original Message] > From: William Robb > When I did my wee test to see if the anti-shake worked, > I just put the camera onto the back of my A600/5.6 and > went out and took pictures. I didn't know about inputting > the focal length. I have not a clue about what the camera > thought was mounted, but the antishake still worked > marvelously. I don't know how big a deal inputting focal > length will be in the big scheme of things, my guess is not > very. > > For the record, here is the link again. Note, it is two > exposures straight out of the camera, so the files are a bit > big. > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/antishake/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
