Cant you understand my point that people who don't have K/M lenses really don't have much weight in their Opinion as to whether K/M should be supported? Of course You wouldn't care if youre not having any lenses Features being disabled!
JCO -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob W Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:55 AM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux Anybody who would like to comment further on this matter must apply in writing to JCO stating why you think you're qualified to do so. JCO, this includes you. JCO will vet your applications and post a list on his own website of people who are allowed to comment. I will monitor JCO's list from time to time, and if your name's not on it I will discount in my own mind all of your contributions to date. Can't say fairer than that. -- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of DagT > Sent: 13 October 2006 08:35 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > > That's great, so now you are saying that those who are not > collectors or owners of very old equipment should not have > the right to wote over the future K-mount. > > There's some something strange about this logic. > > DagT > > > Fra: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Emne: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > > > > IMHO, anyone who doesn't have at least more than a few ( say 3? ) > > K/M lenses, especially good ones, shouldn't even be commenting > > On the matter. Of course you wouldn't care if you don't have > > A signifigant number of lenses losing key functions. > > jco -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
