Read my posts, not for reasons I care About. I want the precision MF mechanisms that The later AF ( and even "A") lenses are lacking And only the K/Ms have that. Yes, there are SOME later lenses I would want for optical qualities That were not made in K/M but those are few and far Between and not in the focal lengths I use often. (Superwides and Super teles) JCO
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:47 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:29 AM Subject: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > Cant you understand my point that people who don't have > K/M lenses really don't have much weight in their > Opinion as to whether K/M should be supported? Of course > You wouldn't care if youre not having any lenses > Features being disabled! Can't you understand that K/M lenses are supported by Pentax DSLRs? Certainly if you don't have any K/M lenses, then they may be slightly less desirable because of the one small extra step required to meter with them. However, they are far less desirable than newer lenses for a lot of other reasons. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
