A 67mm Tiffen. -Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is it?. > I have a rear slip in > filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not gotten > one > due to exorbitant cost > & limited usage. > > Inquiring mind wants to know .... > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm f4 > ED (IF) > > > > Ok. I'll play with it a bit more. > > > > -Brendan > > > > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I did a quick & simple levels adj & > shadow/highlight > >> adj & on you image in > >> CS2 - the details really came out. > >> > >> >When I tweaked cures to bring out more > >> > detail in the shadow area (especially in the > area > >> just > >> > below and to the right of the peak) it looked > >> plain > >> > bad to my eye. So, I left it alone. > >> > >> Well, you were there & know what it looked like > in > >> person so I'll defer to > >> that. > >> > >> BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is > it?. > >> I have a rear slip in > >> filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not gotten > one > >> due to exorbitant cost > >> & limited usage. > >> > >> Kenneth Waller > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Brendan MacRae" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm > f4 > >> ED (IF) > >> > >> > >> > Yeah, curves and minus blue. > >> > > >> > I hope it's not too dark on your monitor. It > looks > >> > good on mine (mine is also calibrated). > >> > > >> > I didn't want to lose the moodiness of the > shot. > >> That > >> > meant letting some of the image stay dark as it > is > >> in > >> > the original. When I tweaked cures to bring out > >> more > >> > detail in the shdow area (especially in the > area > >> just > >> > below and to the right of the peak) it looked > >> plain > >> > bad to my eye. So, I left it alone. > >> > > >> > -Brendan > >> > > >> > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> I too like shooting landscapes with my longer > >> lenses > >> >> - 300 & 600mm! > >> >> > >> >> This image is dark on my calibrated monitor. > >> Details > >> >> appear to be there but > >> >> hard to discern. > >> >> > >> >> Any adjustment after scanning? > >> >> > >> >> Kenneth Waller > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: "Peter Fairweather" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 > 400mm > >> f4 > >> >> ED (IF) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 10/12/06, Brendan MacRae > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> Here's one from over the weekend near > Convict > >> >> Lake in > >> >> >> the eastern Sierras. This is the peak just > to > >> the > >> >> >> south of the lake. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kodak E100G, I want to say around f8 1/90 > sec, > >> >> MLU. I > >> >> >> used a polarizer in the rear holder. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > http://www.members.aol.com/figgaro/convict.jpg > >> >> >> > >> >> >> File size is around 158KB. May slow load on > >> some > >> >> >> systems. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Comments always welcomed. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -Brendan > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > __________________________________________________ > >> >> >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best > spam > >> >> protection around > >> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> >> >> > >> >> > Dear Brendan > >> >> > > >> >> > These pages are supposed to be about > obsolete > >> >> equipment, fancy posting > >> >> > a photo :>) > >> >> > > >> >> > Lovely picture, will save up for the lens, > >> might > >> >> take some time > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > > >> >> > Peter > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > __________________________________________________ > >> > Do You Yahoo!? > >> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > >> protection around > >> > http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > > >> > -- > >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
