I think that was out of context. I implied that you weren't going to
get concerted action in an attempt to get the mechanical aperture
simulator re-instated on a new up level body. There's too much Pentax
has given us enough attitude. Most people who care have replace their M
and K lenses with newer A or later Glass, or have learned to live with
the limitations.
I agree with you that in the long run it's a poor marketing decision.
It was in the short run but the Green button Kludge at least mollified
the user base while they waited for further developments. It seems to
have worked for now. But every erosion of loyalty makes surviving the
next downturn more problematic.
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>>> Unified customer feedback is the best way of
>>>reviving this (technically trivial) part of the classic K-mount.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Unfortunately that's the part that isn't going to happen.
>>
>>
>>
> ... especially with sentiment like that on a "pro-pentax" list.
>It is not "inevitable." It is a (IMO poor) marketing decision that they
>should be made aware was incorrect. The quiet resignation of the "chosen
>few" only aids in the death-knell of the K-mount.
>
>-Cory
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
