I was wondering when someone would come up with something like that.
But it would require a redesign and more software. Add a few dollars to
the bottom line using parts that are not off the shelf.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
>On 12/10/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>No because you have springs, tiny parts, a variable resistor with its
>>own tiny linkage and the pot brush arm that depends on friction but not
>>too much that it would wipe out the resistive surface.
>>
>>
>
>Tech now would make it cheaper to implement in an opto-mechanical
>non-contact sealed unit.
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
