Good, that means offlist ! Bill, meet Adam, Adam meet Bill. Good luck. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:32 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux Now in Digest modetosave bandwidth. Then don't, and Bill and I will talk FD amongst ourselves. -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I don't want to discuss FD/FL anymore as its not > Relevant as I have explained already about 10 times. > READ section #2 of my post. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:55 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux Now in Digest > modeto save bandwidth. > > 1. Only one body, and it was the cheapest. They killed the F1 and the > T90, T80 and T70 off almost immediately after the EOS introduction. > Can't sell what you don't make. > > -Adam > > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> 1. They did leave FD bodies in production for a few years >> ( most likely sales fell off so it wasn't economically feasable) >> 2. I have said this over and over again - CANON USERS GOT >> A NEW AND IMPROVED MOUNT when EOS came out - THERE IS NO NEW AND >> IMPROVED MOUNT on the current pentax DSLR bodies. You are an >> Idiot if you cant understand this simple fundamental difference >> Between what happened with Canon and what happened with pentax >> DSLRS. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of >> William Robb >> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:29 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator survey,part Deaux Now in Digest > mode >> to save bandwidth. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "J. C. O'Connell" >> Subject: RE: K1D aperture simulator survey, part Deaux >> >> >>> This is stupid enough to drop. >>> Anyone over 6 yrs old could easily understand what I implied >>> In the post. You are just aruing to argue. >> You need to post consice thoughts in a consice and understandable > manner >> if you want to be understood. I can't be made responsible for >> misunderstanding your vague drivel. >> >> >>> Brilliant post, it just adds so much to the discussion. >>> Next time, try to post something meaningful, huh? >> >> You too. >> >>> FD/EOS is a stupid analogy because it's the WRONG >>> Analogy. Cant you understand the difference between >>> Incompatability and lack of support of something >>> That isnt incompatble? Obviously not or you wouldn't >>> Be going on and on about Canon FD/EOS mounts. >> >> It's a good analogy in that it highlites one company who completely >> screwed their user base by dropping support for millions of lenses. >> There was nothing to stop Canon from either making the EOS cameras >> adaptable to the FD lenses, or leaving a couple of FD mount bodies in >> production. >> Nothing except corporate greed, anyway. >> >> >> William Robb >> >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
