I disagree that its not ecomically viable on a $1000 Body. If you don't agree that's your opinion but it Aint a fact like you seem to think it is. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 9:55 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey > If I am going to buy the camera with a feature and they > Remove tha feature and I don't buy it, they lost a sale > Dummy. They have never sold a DSLR with an aperture simulator lever (aperture cam follower). They can't remove what they never put into it in the first place. The simple fact is, Pentax doesn't think the aperture simulator is economically viable anymore. They don't think that the gains in sales made by including it will be offset by the cost of including it. The economics are pretty simple to understand, and it was an economic decision for them. BTW, stop with the name calling, it's childish. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
