Thanks mate.  I've set my mate straight.  :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:41 PM
Subject: RE: File size of scanned 6x7 neg


> Your mate is grossly mistaken..  Rob Studdert has given you some more
> realistic figures.  Just to put those figures in perspective, I've some
> 8-bit scans of B&W 35mm done @ 4000ppi that are more than twice that size.
> I suppose one must define what "high res" is <LOL>  Here's a chart that
> provides the size for various film sizes and resolutions:
> http://www.colorfolio.com/resolutions.htm
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>
>> I've got a mate telling me a high res drum scan of a 6x7 neg would only
> be 10MB in
>> TIFF format.  Surely it would be in the hundreds of MB neighbourhood
> wouldn't it?
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to