On 20/10/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm aware of this. I just meant there's nothing intrinsic in the image > data that relates to a physical size. This is what trips up a lot of > people. I've had editors of publications ask for files with no > information other than "oh, 300 DPI should do".
Unfortunately like any profession, being in-the-industry doesn't preclude anyone from being an idiot :-( The other unfortunate thing is that I've noticed is that this trait seems to be mainly Mac user centric (just a long term observation guys). -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
