If what you say is true, don't you think they would have done it? Do they 
deliberately loose sales over a mere $5? Are they just stupid or evil?
Don't you think the reason that they don't include feature in the current 
cameras is because they see no financial rewards in doing so?




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: The JCO survey


Manual labor in asia ia probably cheaper than robotics
Most likely at the qty(s) produced due to high
Setup costs. K1000s had a whole bunch of itty bitty
Parts and were hand assemebled essentially and sold
For dirt cheap.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pål Jensen
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 7:22 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey

Shel:
----- Original Message ----- 
> How do you know the part in question costs $5.00?  Does the $5.00
reflect
> only the cost of materials, or does it include any manufacturing and
setup
> costs to implement the item in cameras that were designed not to
include
> the part?


If it cost $5 and you sell a million cameras thats five million.
I personally believe that the lens mount without mechanical coupling are

more suited for robotic assembly. Mechanical linkages needs precision
and is
probably far more expensive to manufacture I suspect. Therefore I don't
think we will see a completely compatible lens mount in anything but a
top-of-the-line body if at all.
Personally, I find this issue trivial. Although it would have been nice
with
complete comaptibility with K and M lenses, Pentax after all fully
support
all lenses made after 1983. Thats best in business.

Pål




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to