Well, you're getting pretty emotional, even when you try to argue logically.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell > Its an illogical and incomplete argument actually. > This isnt about emaotion, this is about logic. > Permnent removal of the K/M full support at this > Time (no changes in lens mount) on ALL pentax DSLRs is illogical and > Irrational. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mark Roberts > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 9:55 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > Pål Jensen wrote: > > > If it cost $5 and you sell a million cameras thats five million. > > > > I personally believe that the lens mount without mechanical > > coupling are more suited for robotic assembly. Mechanical > > linkages needs precision and is probably far more expensive > > to manufacture I suspect. Therefore I don't think we will see > > a completely compatible lens mount in anything but a > > top-of-the-line body if at all. > > Personally, I find this issue trivial. Although it would have > > been nice with complete comaptibility with K and M lenses, > > Pentax after all fully support all lenses made after 1983. > >Thats best in business. > > > That's all well and good Pål, but your rational arguments aren't > going to have any effect on what is essentially an emotional > reaction.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
