Dave, It's his way of dealing with being proven wrong.
-Adam David Savage wrote: > John, do you talk to people like this face to face? > > The anonymity & security of insulting people over the internet is so > much easier than doing it face to face. Less risk of a black eye. > > Being direct is one thing, but unwarranted name calling is just childish. > > Dave > > On 10/22/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not so quick you big dummy. He, by his own admission >> Said he really liked the automation his newer lenses >> Provide. Well, well, well, if he likes automation, its >> Pretty stupid to say its of no consequence or important >> To have the K/M automation features removed. If he >> Doesn't care about the very things he says he likes alot, that >> Makes him QUITE illogical by any standards. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Keith McGuinness >> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 8:26 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: The JCO survey >> >> Shel Belinkoff wrote: >>> It's not an either/or proposition. I can shoot any way I please, and >> get >>> pleasure of varying degrees from whatever my choice is. Of course, >> you're >>> so blinded by what you perceive as being the one and only way of doing >>> things, you can't understand that. >> Of course! >> >> And I agreed with Shel's original post on how he shoots with the >> various lenses. >> >> His point was, simply, that because of the way he shoots, the >> loss of the aperture thingy is of little consequence. >> >> THAT argument is simple and perfectly logical. >> >> Suggesting that the way the he shoots is illogical is beside the >> point. He can use his camera and lenses any way he likes to get >> the pictures he wants. If it works for him, then that's the end >> of that argument. >> >> Keith McG > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
