The Digital Rebel was indeed on the market when the *istD shipped. It 
was announced in August and shipped in late spetember IIRC.

And everything about the Digital Rebel was lower-spec than the *istD, 
escept the flash sync.

The Digital Rebel is a cheap plastic camera with a tiny wee pentamirror 
finder, slow AF, slow to turn on (About 3x as slow as the *istD), with a 
  crippled flash subsystem, limited to ISO1600 and a single-wheel 
interface. It's roughly comparable to the *istDL, except the DL has a 
superior finder and superior build quality. The only thing comparable 
between the Digital Rebel and the *istD is image quality, teh Rebel's 
was as good as any other 6MP body.

-Adam


J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Was the digtal rebel on the market when the istD
> Came out and what was lower about it other than
> Price?
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 10:51 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The JCO survey
> 
> Canon Digital Rebel (Announced Aug 03, 3 months before the *istD shipped
> 
> in october 03), Fuji S2 Pro (Wasn't replaced by the S3 Pro until mid 
> 2004). The D70 arrived shortly after  the *istD (Jan 04).
> 
> The *istD was comparable to the D100 and 10D in specifications and 
> performance (Actually the 10D was a bit better than the other two due to
> 
> a higher framerate and larger buffer), which were current models when it
> 
> was introduced. All 3 were mid-range bodies getting sold as semi-pro 
> bodies (Which none of them were).
> 
> -Adam
> 
> 
> 
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>> Name one DSLR on the market that was LOWER
>> Specificed and not discontiuned when *istD
>> Came out. Pentax
>> Started cheap and at the bottom and worked 
>> Their way DOWN ( until the K100D and K10D).
>> jco 
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
>> Adam Maas
>> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 3:20 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> It was almost identical to the Nikon D100, and the Canon EOS 10D
> offered
>> only a larger buffer over the D100 and *istD. The Canon D60 and D30
> were
>> lower-end models, as was the Nikon D70 that shortly followed the
> *istD's
>> introduction. And at the time it was the best-specified camera in 
>> production at Pentax (The MZ-S, which is the only recent body to be 
>> better-specified than the *istD, ended production at approximately the
> 
>> same time). The Canon Digital Rebel was introduced about that time as 
>> well, and was far less camera than the *istD (In fact the original
> rebel
>> is arguably the lowest-end DSLR ever made, only the earlier Fuji S1
> Pro 
>> can give it a run (the Fuji is less capable, but far earlier
> technology)
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>> The *istD WAS a bottom line model compared to 
>>> All other makes and models of DSLRS on the market
>>> At the time. Just because they later made even
>>> Lower specified models doesn't make it "better"
>>> The bottom just got lower which was weird.
>>> jco
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>> Of
>>> Shel Belinkoff
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 11:54 AM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>>>
>>> You haven't a clue.  The istD was _not_ a bottom of the line model,
>> nor
>>> did
>>> it seem that Pentax was trying to put out "the cheapest possible
> model
>>> they
>>> could ..."  After the D came the DS, which was substantially less
>>> expensive
>>> even though it had some benefits and features the D didn't have.  The
>> DS
>>> was quickly followed by the DL, which was even less expensive, had
>> fewer
>>> features than the DS.  The DS and DL were great successes for Pentax.
>>> Shel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> [Original Message]
>>>> From: J. C. O'Connell 
>>>> This is the third time I have posted my thery on this.
>>>> I think that Pentax's first DSLR (*istD) was trying
>>>> To be the cheapest possible model they could hit the
>>>> DSLR scene with. In that case, it's a BOTTOM OF THE LINE
>>>> Model 
>>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to