This is the first time I have put anybody in a kill file. It's more than I can stand or have time for (just deleting the unread posts is a pain in the neck).
Tom C. ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: The JCO survey Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:37:23 -0400 I have left this list on three separate occasions in the recent past because I found the attitude of, and the comments by, J. C. O'Connell so disturbing. I was afraid that if I continued to read such material, I would disgrace myself by descending to the same level. Can we end this thread and move on? Please? Dan M On 10/21/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least I don't contradict myself, that's the worst > Possible thing to do in a so called discussion > Or debate. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 10:47 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > You responses are so demeaning and insipid that they brand you as a > complete asshole for however long you remain a member of this list. > JCO, your are dead meat as far as most of us are concerned. > Paul > On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:16 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > > Not so quick you big dummy. He, by his own admission > > Said he really liked the automation his newer lenses > > Provide. Well, well, well, if he likes automation, its > > Pretty stupid to say its of no consequence or important > > To have the K/M automation features removed. If he > > Doesn't care about the very things he says he likes alot, that > > Makes him QUITE illogical by any standards. > > jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > Keith McGuinness > > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 8:26 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >> It's not an either/or proposition. I can shoot any way I please, and > > get > >> pleasure of varying degrees from whatever my choice is. Of course, > > you're > >> so blinded by what you perceive as being the one and only way of > >> doing > >> things, you can't understand that. > > > > Of course! > > > > And I agreed with Shel's original post on how he shoots with the > > various lenses. > > > > His point was, simply, that because of the way he shoots, the > > loss of the aperture thingy is of little consequence. > > > > THAT argument is simple and perfectly logical. > > > > Suggesting that the way the he shoots is illogical is beside the > > point. He can use his camera and lenses any way he likes to get > > the pictures he wants. If it works for him, then that's the end > > of that argument. > > > > Keith McG > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
