Huh? Another inscrutable post from JCO. Paul On Oct 22, 2006, at 4:39 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Don't you understand when you buy a new car you > Are only getting what they are doing lately? > Its not going to do you any good 10 years > Down the road unless you are looking to buy > A 10 year old used car. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 4:03 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > No JD Powers isn't just INITIAL quality. Do you always speak > emphatically of things which you obviously have no knowledge. JD > Powers researches all manner of things, including long-term > durability. Why do you always shoot your mouth off without doing any > research or even any serious thinking? Go here and learn: http:// > www.jdpower.com/ > On Oct 22, 2006, at 3:55 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >> JD powers is INITIAL quality, not how >> Well something is built for long term but rather how >> Well something was assembled & inspected before >> It leaves the factory. PERIOD. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of >> graywolf >> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 12:00 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: The JCO survey >> >> Ah, bullshit, the american and japanese cars are likely built on the >> same assembly line nowadays. Even as far back as 1980 that was >> possible, >> >> now it is likely. Hey, Joe, is this a toyota or a chevy, which >> badge do >> I put on it? >> >> -- >> >> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>> Don't forget that JD powers numbers are only for initial >>> Quality which is essentially how well the car is assembled >>> And inspected before it leaves the factory. It has almost >>> Nothing to do with build quality and long term reliablity. >>> jco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of >>> Paul Stenquist >>> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 7:28 AM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: The JCO survey >>> >>> Look at the JD Power numbers. Toyota and Honda are leaders in >>> quality, >> >>> but GM is close to the top these days as is Ford. All of the US >>> carmakers outperform the Europeans. It's not opinion. It's fact. >>> On Oct 22, 2006, at 5:11 AM, keith_w wrote: >>> >>>> Paul Stenquist wrote: >>>>> Sorry, but you don't have a clue. >>>> I have a lot more than a clue, Paul >>>> My family and I have lived with various GM cars over the years, as >>> well >>>> as perhaps 30 other vehicles personally. >>>> That includes a number of Chevys and Buicks. >>>> And for me, a preponderance of foreign iron, including Mercedes, >>> Hondas >>>> and Toyotas. >>>> >>>> The Hondas and Toyotas have out-performed and outlasted any of my >>> other >>>> cars, in all respects, without regard to marque. >>>> >>>> GM's shoddy workmanship and inattention to quality control as a way >> of >>>> automotive life, has lost me as a customer for life. >>>> >>>> keith whaley >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
