Correction I meant "Incompatible". jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 3:59 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: The JCO survey
The canon lenses may have become completely Compatible for other reasons so the register Change was a moot issue. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 11:56 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > > Or maybe they will go 2mm longer, who knows? After all, they have to > sell lenses (and the customers *must* care about the companies' > needs). Doubtful. If they stay with the small sensor size, it makes more sense technically to shorten the registration distance. That 2mm increase in register distance was done for two reasons. One was to make it easier to put in a larger mirror for those very common super telephoto lenses, the other was to ensure that FD lenses were obsoleted. Note that Pentax managed the mirror issue quite well with the LX. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
