I haven't misunderstood anything mate.

These recent posts have been about your communication style, nothing more.

Dave

At 10:38 AM 24/10/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>YOU have misunderstood him because that isnt what
>Happened. I did everything I could to make him
>Happy at the time and I thought I did ( he
>Accepted the lens and a partial refund ).
>Now he comes back with this bullshit about
>How I abused him and he would never deal with
>Me again? That isnt how we left the deal settled.
>And don't pretend for one minute that he was
>Saying that to encourage others to not deal with
>Me either EVEN AFTER I SATISFIED HIM FULLY
>At the time. Total fucking bullshit is what it is.
>He didn't have to bring that up AT ALL
>But he did for a really slimy reason. Complete Asshole.
>I call them like I see them and that was totally wrong
>Considering how that deal was worked out for him
>At my expense.
>
>JCO
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>David Savage
>Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:48 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>
>Shel never said you "ripped him off" he didn't even imply it. What he
>said was:
>
>"When I bought the K50/1.4 from you on eBay, and told you the front
>element
>was lose, you replied with a challenging, abusive email. Of  course,
>I'll
>never do business with you again."
>
>The "...you replied with a challenging, abusive email." part I can
>believe
>going by your email etiquette here on the PDML.
>
>Given that Shel was making a point about your communication skills, not
>your eBay history, you seriously over reacted in your response & at the
>same time proved his point.
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>At 09:26 AM 24/10/2006, you wrote:
> >And what do you call someone who
> >Comes to a MUTUAL agreement on
> >A business matter and then goes
> >On to tell hundreds of people
> >I ripped him off? That's incredible.
> >He refused a full refund I offered and accepted
> >A partial refund. Now he has the
> >Freaking nerve to insinuate that
> >I somehow ripped him off? That's
> >Totally unfreaking believable.
> >I take ebay customer matters very seriously
> >And I don't think that saying something
> >Like that after what actully happened is
> >Even remotely correct thing to do. It's massive
> >Slander. He was just taking a super cheap shot
> >At me for reasons I do not know but
> >That was just way too God Damn over the
> >Line.
> >jco
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> >David Savage
> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:47 PM
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >Subject: RE: The JCO survey
> >
> >Your a class act John.
> >
> >Dave
> >
> >At 08:30 AM 24/10/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> > >Look I don't think it's right AT ALL for you to bring up
> > >Our personal business matters on the list. THAT is far
> > >More FOUL than any four letter word name calling. I have a
>spectacular
> > >Reputation at ebay and I don't want people like you
> > >Trashing me for no reason because we settled that minor
> > >Dispute didn't we? You are getting really [EMAIL PROTECTED] low
> > >To make comments like that about me on this list.
> > >I do not rip people off and I am not a crooked ebay dealer.
> > >Did we come to an equitable agreement on that
> > >Issue or NOT? Now I am really f%#$%#ing pissed.
> > >That's totally uncalled for. I suggest everyone
> > >Go to ebay and check my feedback. You are a freaking
> > >Low life to say something like that especially
> > >After we settled that minor problem to a mutual agreement
> > >At the time. In fact, that's it, FUCK YOU dude!
> > >My ebay record speaks for itself, you are one full of
> > >Shit asshole lowlife to say that kind of horseshit
> > >About my business practices when there is nothing
> > >To back it up. Arguing cameras is one thing but to slander
> > >Me with this horsehit is going WAY WAY to far.
> > >P.s. FUCK YOU AGAIN! I cant believe you did that. What
> > >A freaking scumbag.
> > >SINCERELY,
> > >JCO.
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of
> > >Shel Belinkoff
> > >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:11 PM
> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >Subject: RE: The JCO survey
> > >
> > >You've replied to me with your disgusting diatribes when I've not
>used
> > >any
> > >such tones with you. You have done so with others as well, often
> >calling
> > >people dumb or idiots, and worse, for expressing their opinions,
> > >especially
> > >those opinions run counter to yours. You've replied to me with your
> > >disgusting diatribes when I have gotten fed up with you and replied
>in
> > >kind.  Regardless of how people address you, you can choose to be
> >civil,
> > >but you don't.
> > >
> > >In fact, one of the list members noted that he's left the list
>several
> > >times because of your posts.  He wasn't even writing to you, just
> > >posting a
> > >general message.  Your comment was "Screw you, dude ..."  (See below)
> > >
> > >I think that your foul mouth and abusive language are so much a part
>of
> > >you
> > >that you aren't even fully aware of what you say or how you come
> >across.
> > >
> > >When I bought the K50/1.4 from you on eBay, and told you the front
> > >element
> > >was lose, you replied with a challenging, abusive email.  Of  course,
> > >I'll
> > >never do business with you again.
> > >
> > >
> > >Shel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > [Original Message]
> > > > From: J. C. O'Connell
> > >
> > > > My replies are of the same tone as the posts
> > > > Directed at me. I never start with the name
> > > > Calling but I will certainly volley.
> > > > jco
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Shel Belinkoff
> > >
> > > > How about because of your vile, disgusting language and rude
> >behavior.
> > >
> > > > It's one thing to argue incessantly over the same point, but your
> > > > "style" isn't fit for continuous human consumption.
> > > >
> > > > Shel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > [Original Message]
> > > > > From: J. C. O'Connell
> > > >
> > > > > Screw You, dude. I don't see any reason why anyone
> > > > > Would need/want to leave the list because of my posts.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to