Hi there, John,

No complaints from me on your posts.
(That is, other than the annnoying upper case letters at each linebreak.)

(In fact I am slightly amazed at how you manage to stay on topic in the long 
run of posts and also at to what length you find it wortwhile arguing your 
case, so to speak.
(Btw. It has also struck me that looked upon as a series (of posts), yours 
could actually be described as a (fairly unusual) minimalistic approach to 
list postings (the term used as in music and fine arts - a motif that is 
repeated with slight changes each time presented.) )

Not necessarily supporting it, I can also appreciate why you are using the 
strong language below. (To be perfectly honest I had a chuckle at it, but 
maybe that's just me and my peasant background...:-) )

Anyway, I go back some eight years as a member on this list (I don't recall 
if you were already here or if you arrived later) and just for the record I 
want to state that wouldn't hesitate a second to do business with you and I 
would have full confidence in you wanting to do it right.

Good night and good morning,
Lasse


From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 3:30 AM
Subject: RE: The JCO survey


> Look I don't think it's right AT ALL for you to bring up
> Our personal business matters on the list. THAT is far
> More FOUL than any four letter word name calling. I have a spectacular
> Reputation at ebay and I don't want people like you
> Trashing me for no reason because we settled that minor
> Dispute didn't we? You are getting really [EMAIL PROTECTED] low
> To make comments like that about me on this list.
> I do not rip people off and I am not a crooked ebay dealer.
> Did we come to an equitable agreement on that
> Issue or NOT? Now I am really f%#$%#ing pissed.
> That's totally uncalled for. I suggest everyone
> Go to ebay and check my feedback. You are a freaking
> Low life to say something like that especially
> After we settled that minor problem to a mutual agreement
> At the time. In fact, that's it, FUCK YOU dude!
> My ebay record speaks for itself, you are one full of
> Shit asshole lowlife to say that kind of horseshit
> About my business practices when there is nothing
> To back it up. Arguing cameras is one thing but to slander
> Me with this horsehit is going WAY WAY to far.
> P.s. FUCK YOU AGAIN! I cant believe you did that. What
> A freaking scumbag.
> SINCERELY,
> JCO.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:11 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>
> You've replied to me with your disgusting diatribes when I've not used
> any
> such tones with you. You have done so with others as well, often calling
> people dumb or idiots, and worse, for expressing their opinions,
> especially
> those opinions run counter to yours. You've replied to me with your
> disgusting diatribes when I have gotten fed up with you and replied in
> kind.  Regardless of how people address you, you can choose to be civil,
> but you don't.
>
> In fact, one of the list members noted that he's left the list several
> times because of your posts.  He wasn't even writing to you, just
> posting a
> general message.  Your comment was "Screw you, dude ..."  (See below)
>
> I think that your foul mouth and abusive language are so much a part of
> you
> that you aren't even fully aware of what you say or how you come across.
>
> When I bought the K50/1.4 from you on eBay, and told you the front
> element
> was lose, you replied with a challenging, abusive email.  Of  course,
> I'll
> never do business with you again.
>
> Shel

>> [Original Message]
>> From: J. C. O'Connell
>
>> My replies are of the same tone as the posts
>> Directed at me. I never start with the name
>> Calling but I will certainly volley.
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shel Belinkoff
>
>> How about because of your vile, disgusting language and rude behavior.
>
>> It's one thing to argue incessantly over the same point, but your
>> "style" isn't fit for continuous human consumption.
>>
>> Shel
>>
>> > [Original Message]
>> > From: J. C. O'Connell
>>
>> > Screw You, dude. I don't see any reason why anyone
>> > Would need/want to leave the list because of my posts. 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to