But its PURE FUCKING BULLSHIT.
I didn’t "abuse" him and I 
Treated him MORE than fairly.
My ebay feedback backs me up on this.
Both you and him are FULL OF SHIT.
He took a super cheap shot. You
Don’t go running your mouth
About vendors when they treat you
Fairly AND I DID treat him fairly.
It plain out slander and just a cheap
Way for him to try to damage my
Ebay business reputation and it was
TOTALLY unjustified. Stay the hell
Of the this because you are only
Making a bad situation worse by
Trying to imply it is or was
Justible action for him to post
That when it wasn’t based on the
Options I gave him at the time
( INCLUDING A FUUL REFUND ) and the friendly
Resolution reached on the matter. (AT THAT TIME).
jco
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: The JCO survey



>
> This said. Based on what I have seen here, I have no reason not to
> make
> business with you.
>

Unless you end up with a defective product, anyway....

> But I do think Shel has a very valid point in his third paragraph. It
> seems
> that you are not fully aware how your language and general list
> behaviour
> come across. Remember; this is a family list. Children, and others,
> might
> get scared. I can hardly imagine that's your purpose.
>

JCO is an eBay vendor. Vendor reputations are based not only on the
product they sell, but how they deal with customer service issues. If a
vedor treats his custmers like crap ( I am presuming Shel is being
truthful based on JCO's conduct on list), then he has every right (and
perhaps a duty to warn his friends) to tell the world he was badly
treated.

William Robb




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to