It's interesting that many people, in general, confuse faith with credulity. 
  The biblical definition of faith is anything but that.

Hebrews 11:1 - Faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the 
evident demonstration of realities though not beheld.

So whether we are talking about things of a scientific or a religious 
nature, if it can't be seen and empirically proven, faith is involved.


Tom C.




----Original Message Follows----
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: OT: Snowflake
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:53:56 -0400

Yet it still requires an act of faith to attribute any given stone
that appears to be an arrowhead to a human creator. Nature can
achieve the same result in many different ways.
Paul
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:54 PM, John Francis wrote:

 >
 > The arrowhead is attributed to a human creator precisely because
 > we *do* understand how that creation process took place - an argument
 > based on knowledge, not on ignorance.  It's nothing to do with
 > perceived attributes, and everything to do with understanding.
 >
 >
 >
 > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:41:18PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
 >> No  - I see it has attributes that indicate it has a maker or
 >> designer.  A
 >> roughly symmetrical chipped piece of flint lying on the ground is
 >> believed
 >> to be an arrowhead.  We don't see the aboriginal that crafted the
 >> arrowhead
 >> yet we believe the event occurred.  We don't see the designer of our
 >> physical universe, far more complex, and since we can't see one,
 >> we believe
 >> one does not exist.
 >>
 >> That doesn't manifest ignorance?
 >>
 >>
 >> Tom C.
 >>
 >>> That is astonishing. I'm an atheist but it's difficult to look at
 >> that
 >>> photo and not perceive a creator.
 >>>
 >>
 >> Ah, the Argument from Personal Ignorance - "I don't know how that
 >> came
 >> to be, therefore God made it".
 >>
 >> Bob
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> --
 >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 >> [email protected]
 >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 >
 > --
 > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 > [email protected]
 > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to