There is a wide gulf between the assumption that something MUST have had a designer and the much more plausible assumption that something MIGHT have had a designer. Those who believe our knowledge of nature and the universe is complete are themselves lacking in real knowledge and understanding. On Oct 26, 2006, at 5:20 PM, DagT wrote:
> The only reason why some think things like this has to have a > designer is because they cant believe that such structures can have > natural causes, which in my view just tells me that they don´t know > much about nature. > > DagT > > Den 26. okt. 2006 kl. 21.41 skrev Tom C: > >> No - I see it has attributes that indicate it has a maker or >> designer. A >> roughly symmetrical chipped piece of flint lying on the ground is >> believed >> to be an arrowhead. We don't see the aboriginal that crafted the >> arrowhead >> yet we believe the event occurred. We don't see the designer of our >> physical universe, far more complex, and since we can't see one, we >> believe >> one does not exist. >> >> That doesn't manifest ignorance? >> >> >> Tom C. >> >>> That is astonishing. I'm an atheist but it's difficult to look at >> that >>> photo and not perceive a creator. >>> >> >> Ah, the Argument from Personal Ignorance - "I don't know how that >> came >> to be, therefore God made it". >> >> Bob >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > DagT > http://dag.foto.no > > Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
