I think Paul is losing it. Paul Stenquist wrote:
>There is no such thing as an aperture simulator. it's merely a >reflection of man's inability to accept his shortcomings. Once we >all learn to accept one another, there will be no need for these >illusions of an aperture simulator. >On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote: > > > >>On 10/26/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>If the glass is yellowish at certain angles, is it one of the >>>radioactive ones? >>> >>> >>> >>If your super-tak is a 50/1.4 or a 35/2 then you may have a >>radioactive lens. Otherwise, the yellow you see at certain angles is >>probably due to the way the coating reflects yellow light. >>Interestingly enough, later super-tak 55/2 and 55/1.8 lenses with the >>aperture simulator lug (here we go again) may actually have SMC. I've >>read differing opinions on this, so don't take my word for it. >> >> >>-- >>Scott Loveless >>http://www.twosixteen.com >>Shoot more film! >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
