I think if you're never going to print larger than 8x10 from a full-frame image, 6 megapixels is more than adequate. If you print larger, the 10 megapixel camera will offer an advantage. What' more, it will allow for aggressive cropping when necessary. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A friend just purchased a D200 so we did some comparo shots yesterday. Same > scene, fl, exposure, etc. His D200 and my istDL. He emailed me a couple > frames, 5.8 meg jpegs. I printed his and mine, 7 x 10.5 inches on photo > quality paper. He nor I can detect ANY difference in print quality. My > printer only goes that size max, but I really wonder how much difference > there might be on a 13 x19 for instance. > All this is in trying to determine if I really want a K10 or settle for a > K100 as a second body. I really want the image stabilization, and like the > benefit of having a second body that is identical to the DL in operation. My > thinking is that for the price of the K10 I can get a K100 body and an Epson > 1800 printer! (well, another 100.00 extra) > > Walt > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
