Did both cameras have really top notch lenses
And were both mounted on sturdy tripods? Lens
Quality is going to be more critical at 10Mp
To get the full benefit of 10Mp and of course
You need a sturdy camera to minimize shake.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Walter Hamler
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: 10 meg vs 6 meg

A friend just purchased a D200 so we did some comparo shots yesterday.
Same 
scene, fl, exposure, etc. His D200 and my istDL. He emailed me a couple 
frames, 5.8 meg jpegs. I printed his and mine, 7 x 10.5 inches on photo 
quality paper. He nor I can detect ANY difference in print quality. My 
printer only goes that size max, but I really wonder how much difference

there might be on a 13 x19 for instance.
All this is in trying to determine if I really want a K10 or settle for
a 
K100 as a second body. I really want the image stabilization, and like
the 
benefit of having a second body that is identical to the DL in
operation. My 
thinking is that for the price of the K10 I can get a K100 body and an
Epson 
1800 printer! (well, another 100.00 extra)

Walt 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to