Frank, don't spoil things for Tom by bringing in facts.  Tom is an  
artist.  He wants emotion.

John

On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:38:05 -0000, frank theriault  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 11/8/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How devoid of facts was the Bloomberg article?
>
> "first half net income beat the company's forecast on
> higher-than-expected sales of digital cameras, led by more profitable
> single-lens reflex models."
>
> That's a fact.
>
> "The stock climbed 8.5 percent to 565 yen as of 2:32 p.m. in Tokyo,
> compared with a 0.3 percent advance on the Nikkei 225 Stock Average"
>
> That's a fact.
>
> "Our digital cameras are selling well, especially the high- margin  
> digital SLR,"
>
> That's a fact.
>
> "Net income was 1.09 billion yen ($9.3 million) in the six months
> ended Sept. 30, the company said today in a statement to the Tokyo
> Stock Exchange, compared with the Oct. 20 forecast for 900 million yen
> and a 330 million yen loss a year earlier."
>
> Yet again, more facts.
>
> "The company also raised its forecast for annual net income to 3.3
> billion yen from the previous estimate of 3.1 billion yen and 805
> million yen a year earlier."
>
> Okay, that's not a fact.  That's a forecast.
>
> Am I missing something, Tom?  There's pretty much nothing but facts in
> there.  Except for a (very clearly labelled) forecast.
>
> Perhaps what you're looking for is analysis, explanation, authority.
> But without those things, the facts are what they are.  Like all
> facts, they may be proven wrong with better and other evidence.  But,
> absent such contrary evidence, they are what they are, IMHO.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to