But what I am telling you is your "EXPERIENCE" was with a different, totally wrong, lens. You gave the 35mm lens "experience" AFTER your inital post and mentioned nothing of it in your original post which is specifically what I refuting strongly. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:05 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS I didn't say it's as easy as using the 105, but in truth, it didn't seem much different, either. I notice you're starting to use the same rhetoric as in earlier threads. Once again, totally uncalled for. My comments are not BS - they reflect my experiences. BTW, I wasn't trying to prove any point, just sharing my experience. Once again, YMMV. Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell > YOU missed MY point, and that is that a 35mm lens is > NEVER going to be as easy as a 105mm lens to focus > at the same f-stop/speed on ANY given camera and YOU gave the 105mm > lens as your reference/example when the post was about the 35/3.5 > lenses in particular. Dont tell me that if you use a new > camera/finder, that the 35mm lens is just as easy as a 105mm lens at > the same fstop becuase your full of BS if you are trying to say that. > It never can be. YOU used the wrong example to prove your point in the > first reply post by saying you just used a 105mm lens and had > no problems with it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Shel Belinkoff > Don't you be confused. While I used a 105 recently, I've also used > wide lenses as well. Until you spend some time using the current > DSLRs, you've no idea about how bright or useful the finder may be > with slower and wider lenses. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
