thats easy for you to say, you werent the one personally attacked (unprovoked) in the middle of a civil technical discussion for no reason. JCO
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 1:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: list abuse I agree. I've had plenty of leeway for him in the past and I've even defended his right to make his points. I have now grown very very very tired of this rude and obnoxious behavior. I personally vote to kick his *** off the list. It'll free up space in my junkmail folder. Tom C. >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: PDML List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: list abuse >Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:47:35 -0800 > >I disagree, Paul. A list owner's responsibility is to manage the list, >deal with technical issues of subscription and communications, and deal >with problem subscribers. JCO can go off and dominate the list traffic >on almost any topic. It creates bad will and a poor image for the >mailiing list, and for Pentax by association. > >Remember that the mailing list is archived and available anonymously to >the public. Do you really think it a good thing that a bazillion >messages full of such nasty dialog/diatribe is published associated >with your name, Pentax' name, etc? > >G > > >On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > Alll that's really necessary is that the rest of us ignore JCO's > > posts. He's obviously not well, yet people continue to push his > > buttons and incite him. The problem is easily solved. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
