I already posted there is a difference between accurate focussing and a photo being in focus due to deep DOF coverage. In the former, you want/need to get the exact focus distance to control the foregroud/backgroud DOF, in the latter youre not controlling anything, the subject just happens to fall ANYWHERE within the DOF at the shooting aperture. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Williams Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 6:59 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? And this entire stream of crap has been baiting me. I can hardly contain myself. Someone, about a thousand posts ago, said he'd been using lenses for 30 years -- was it JCO? Well, I've been using them for a hell of a lot longer than that and still can't focus the goddamn things. I have more trouble with 400mm than I've ever had with 50mm or even 30mm. And I'm used to lenses, believe me, not only those on cameras either. You can't make a rule that will apply to all and you can't even make a valid general statement about this matter either. Now lets see how many hundreds of posts this one generates. D Christian wrote: > Cotty wrote: > >> On 13/11/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >> >> >>> You're correct on this JCO. Bill Robb is bating you. Ignore him and >>> he'll stop. >>> >> Paul, stop bating Bill ;-) >> >> > > Cotty, apologize immediately for baiting Paul. :-) > > -- Dr E D F Williams www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/ http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/ 41660 TOIVAKKA - Finland - +358400706616 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
