Those are a lot of qualifications, but I suppose there's at least some
truth to them ;-))

I, too, am waiting to see what the 16-50/2.8 is going to be like.

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton 

> Do I think there are better optics out there in a prime...yes.  But at
> this time you would have to go to the K or M 24/2.8 to get it.  I am
> very interested to see just how good the upcoming 16-50/2.8 lens is.
> I'm hoping it is of the image quality that the old FA* 28-70/2.8 is.
>
> So for the time being, I think the DA 16-45 is the best lens in the
> range that you can get for a reasonable price and having AF
> capabilities.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to