Doh: That should have said: Okay, it's not dusk. It's late afternoon. When does dusk begin?
On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Okay, it's not dusk. It's late afternoon. When does dusk being. There > was still a good bit of light. it's a good exposure in the given > light. Tonality is right on for what I saw. Your looking for dust > bunnies, Shel. > Paul > On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:43 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >> But it doesn't look like dusk .... too bright, IMO. Tonality looks >> way off >> for dusk. >> >> Shel >> >> >> >>> [Original Message] >>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>> Date: 11/24/2006 5:09:07 PM >>> Subject: PESO: My First K10D BW >>> >>> Both at ISO 800. The first is with the DA 12-24, f4 @ 1/45th. The >>> second is at dusk with the DA 50-200, f5.6 2 1/125th. >>> >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5249643&size=lg >>> >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5249643&size=lg >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
