Usually, my sharpening for full or doubled resolution "normal" image files with Smart Sharpen is pixels: 2.1, 80-90%, basic mode. A similar result with USM happens at pixels:1.7, 70%, threshold 2.
Godfrey On Nov 24, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > I'm speaking of USM> The percentage is irrelevant without reference > to the pixel size or the threshold. I back way down on the other two. > Paul > On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> Wow, are you speaking of USM or Smart Sharpening? >> >> With the DS bodies, I have almost never applied more than 80-90% >> sharpening with Smart Sharpening. More than that causes artifacts and >> problems in most photos. A very few have required pounding up the >> sharpening to "crunchy" for a print. >> >> Godfrey >> >> On Nov 24, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >>> I've used well over 100% many times. With the *istD photos, I >>> generally used 261% at 1.5 pixels and a threshold of 11. With the >>> K10D I'm still experimenting, but I seem to be coming in at about >>> 100%, 1.2 pixels and a threshold of 19. It's all a matter of >>> subjective taste. But I do look for artifacts and dial back if I see >>> anything unhappy. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
