Yes, "dusk" was a poor choice of words. Although four PM approaches magic hour at this time of year. But in heavy shade, it's all irrelevant. It's just cold, diffuse light. No problem. Paul On Nov 24, 2006, at 11:16 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Well, Paul, you told us it's dusk, so I'd expect to see a certain > tonality, > brightness, and contrast level. Instead I saw a rather bright > photo, so I > have to wonder ... Dusk begins around "magic hour" and runs a > liitle past, > imo, so the lighting would be a lot different than late afternoon. > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Paul Stenquist > >> Okay, it's not dusk. It's late afternoon. When does dusk being. There >> was still a good bit of light. it's a good exposure in the given >> light. Tonality is right on for what I saw. Your looking for dust >> bunnies, Shel. > >> Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> >>> But it doesn't look like dusk .... too bright, IMO. Tonality looks >>> way off for dusk. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
