Thanks, Godfrey. Couldn't go and look at the moment. All I know for certain is that it seemed to perform the same as the Transcend cards, which is to say very well. Paul On Nov 26, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Extreme III then. :-) > > G > > On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> It's actually Ultra III or something. The newest Sandisk card. I >> believe it said 133X on the package >> On Nov 26, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >>> Sandisk Ultra II cards are 60x rating. >>> >>> Godfrey >>> >>> On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> >>>> It's much faster than the *istDS, which I've tried. No comparison. I >>>> have two of the transcend cards. I think they're 150X, and I have >>>> one >>>> Sandisk Ultra II, which I believe is rated at 133X. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
