Cory,

DNG format is an open specification, published and provided by Adobe  
with no license fees for its use. It is not open source as it  
contains no source code. However, there's no reason that open source  
products cannot be based on the specification ... the license clearly  
defines what can or cannot be considered DNG specification, that's  
it, and places no restrictions on redistribution in implementation.  
To wit: dcraw uses the DNG specification and it is an open source  
software product, it meets all the rules and licensing requirements.

So if there was an ecology of software products that allowed  
compatibility with DNG format on Linux, it would be just fine to use  
it ... a PEF to DNG converter would be the FIRST product necessary  
for this until the introduction of the K10D for an all Linux image  
processing workflow.

But little serious user-end image processing happens on Linux at  
present given its limitations in system wide color management and  
good color managed applications at the user-end level. Lots of high- 
end image processing happens (render farms for the cine industry's  
animation and cgi work) on specialized, non-open-source software  
products.

For user-end stuff, if you want to find value in PEF to DNG  
conversion, start promoting DNG as a RAW container format, promote  
more and better user-end color management and applications (whether  
open source or not) and build the software ecology ... and user base.  
A business case for this that returns profit on the investment would  
then become appealing to graphics software providers.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to