I know there's a lot of overlap, but I do sometimes want to use a prime in those ranges. Paul On Dec 3, 2006, at 3:38 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Paul, no offense or pun but I think that > K 24/3.5, > K 28/3.5 > M 40/2.8 > M 200/4 may safely be left behind. Each being a fine optic, but you > have so much overlap in your kit... > > Boris > > On 12/3/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> These are now in my Pelican case.(Some should probably go to the >> shelf:-): >> DA 12-24/4 >> DA 16-45/4 >> K 24/3.5 >> K28/3.5 >> FA 35/2 >> M40/2.8 >> FA 50/1.4 >> DA 50-/200 /4.5-5.6 >> K 85/1.8 >> Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro >> K 135/2.5 >> M 200/4 >> FA 80-310/4.5-5.6 >> A 400/5.6 >> On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:21 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >>> My "essential" lens kit now is: >>> >>> DA14/2.8 >>> FA20-35/4 >>> DA21/3.2 >>> FA35/2 >>> FA50/1.4 >>> FA77/1.8 >>> FA135/2.8 >>> >>> I'm considering selling the FA77 for a DA70 (but the FA77 is very >>> nice...), and will probably update the 35 and 50 to the new DA lenses >>> when they appear. The only 'hole' in my lens kit now is a compact >>> 28mm f/2 lens... I'd like a DA Limited for that. >>> >>> I much prefer the primes for their speed and size. >>> >>> Godfrey >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- > Boris > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
