The K10D is actually a pretty good fit for almost everybody (provided they can afford it), other than those who still hope against hope for a "full-frame" Pentax camera which is never going to come.
John On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:52:22 -0000, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It has nothing to do with fit. It's simply a good product that should > be applauded. The 645 will hopefully be a good product as well. I'd > love to have both. > Paul > On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:21 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > >> On 06/12/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Unbelievable. Pentax finally introduces a great product that is well >>> accepted, no make that enthusiastically welcomed and widely coveted. >>> And still the nihilists look for something wrong. You're a hoot, Rob. >> >> If it fit everyone why the enthusiastic talk of 645D and a top end K >> mount body? There's big differences between being a pessimist or a >> realist. Then there's the unreservedly positive, definitely screw >> loose in my view (as everyone is entitled). >> >> -- >> Rob Studdert >> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
