Simply indicates it "might" take deeper pockets than had been hoped.
Jack --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07/12/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just received the Jan 2007 issue of SHUTTERBUG. Included in an > article, > > "Photokina, SPECIAL COVERAGE" is a photo of a version of the 645D > > concept camera along with the comment,"..the 645 looked rather > lonely > > as it sat in its sealed transparent case, waiting for the > 30-megapixel > > sensor that will make it a serious contender in digital "medium > > format." As it stood, reportedly in 18-megapixel form, it just > didn't > > have enough megapixels." > > There follows a comment expressing the author's estimate of the > 645D, > > "not shipping 'til mid-2007." > > If they couldn't predict the K10Ds market appeal it really may end up > being a bit of a nightmare. What sensor sill it end up with, what > will > it cost, who will it really appeal to and who might be persuaded to > by > it at the said cost? Any takers? > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
