I'm thinking that it might be useful for cameras without SR in some situations. But if you have SR, I'm guessing that it would work as good as or better in > 90% of the situations, esp one where a heavier lens might be involved. If the lens is lighter, SR will still be better IMO, for all but the longest exposures. It would be an interesting test though.
rg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 08/12/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I looks like it would have alot of vibration. > > > I'm guessing it's better than a poke in the eye with a blunt stick > given the right application but I'm sure it wouldn't replace my > Manfrotto 058 :-) > -- Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man? - Mitch Hedberg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
