SR won't help with 1+ second exposures. I think it's a good idea as a light weight, in your pocket, walk about town tripod alternative.
Cheers, Dave On 12/8/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking that it might be useful for cameras without SR in some > situations. But if you have SR, I'm guessing that it would work as good > as or better in > 90% of the situations, esp one where a heavier lens > might be involved. If the lens is lighter, SR will still be better IMO, > for all but the longest exposures. It would be an interesting test though. > > rg > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 08/12/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I looks like it would have alot of vibration. > > > > > > I'm guessing it's better than a poke in the eye with a blunt stick > > given the right application but I'm sure it wouldn't replace my > > Manfrotto 058 :-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
