Rod, I think I'd have to disagree with this. For sure if you comapre like focal lengths what you say is true, but it is surely better to comapre like FOV, in which case the K10D has a 1.5x advantage over a "full frame" moving sensor system.
Eric. On 11/12/06, Rod Connan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John, > > The movement required would be the same for say a 500mm lens independent of > sensor size - a point in the middle of the sensor would still move the same > distance with the same angular displacement of the camera/lens combination. > > Still I am impressed with getting a fair proportion of my shots with a 500mm > mirror lens sharp at 1/90th hand held without bracing myself. This is on the > K10D. > > The large movement available in the K10D sensor support plate is evidenced > by the clearly heard thunk when you tip the camera from side to side (when > the camera is off) > > Rod > ___________________________________________________________ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John > Forbes > > MJ quotes Canon claiming that in-body SR is no good for long lenses, > because it would require the sensor to move by 1/4 of an inch. > > They are talking of course about full frame 35mm. The required movement > would presumably be rather less on an APS-C sensor. > > John > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
