Godfrey, I would have expected some very immediate, some popping improvement over *istD(S). I am not seeing it. These are all fine pictures, and you're very strong photographer indeed, however, I don't see anything that will tell me - look, Boris, this is where K10D outdoes all its older brothers and sisters...
Just my pixels. On 12/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aside from speed testing, that is. > > I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG > exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost > exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About > 120 some exposures in all fit on a 2G card. > > I processed the DNGs with my usual RAW conversion workflow in ACR. No > noise reduction or sharpening applied, only standard RAW processing > parameters on the adjustment panel. (BTW, I set ACR options to do > sharpening as preview only, so absolutely NO sharpening was applied > in RAW conversion.) No other processing done in Photoshop afterwards, > other than to size and render for my standard web formats with > Actions ... same ones I use for everything I post. The only thing I > had to do different was turn off ACR's Auto processing defaults. > > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/neighborhood-K10D/ > > Please note that there are thumbnails on the index page, normal web- > size pix on the individual pages, and "half-rez" renderings that open > into a separate window if you click on the normal web-size pix on the > individual pages... > > Comments and feedback always welcome. > > enjoy > Godfrey > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
