Hi! > > Godfrey, I would have expected some very immediate, some popping > > improvement over *istD(S). I am not seeing it. These are all fine > > pictures, and you're very strong photographer indeed, however, I don't > > see anything that will tell me - look, Boris, this is where K10D > > outdoes all its older brothers and sisters... > > Well, where does it outdo them? Pixelage at 6MP is academic on web > images.
Yes of course it is academic. > SR: how does 35mm at 1/8 work on this? > > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/neighborhood-K10D/source/16-imgp0725.html Not a clue. I am trying to see if there is any significant picture quality difference between *istD and K10D given same lens and same or similar scene properly focused and exposed. > And does Godders look good with the K10D half-face or is the -Ds a > better complement to his natural virtues? > > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/neighborhood-K10D/source/02-imgp0641.html Since I haven't met Godders in person, I couldn't answer that question with proper quality. Though the other half-face (not the camera one) looks vaguely familiar to me from other shots ;-). > Other than that, it's a camera, it just does it best to not get in the > way of the lens attached to it. Continuing your sentence "lens attached to it on one side and photographer attached to it on the other side..."... I totally agree. Cheers... -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
