> > From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/12/14 Thu PM 11:59:29 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: K10D and Ring flash > > On 15/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then why the disappointment? You bought it for a specific purpose, > > for which you are delighted that it served satisfactorily. Why not > > leave it at that? > > > > Have such a purpose in mind when you invest in a new flash unit for > > your newer cameras and I bet you'll get your money's worth out of > > them very quickly. > > Some of that post war mentality of my grandparents must have rubbed > off on me. I see this regular and forced redundancy of what are > essentially physically long lived objects as a ridiculous waste of > resources and my cash. And I really despise being told to effectively > get over it and more on. Maybe I'm just a greenie at heart '-)
You're certainly not the "more on". ;-) ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
