In regard to dynamic range, he also pointed out that by tweaking a RAW he got ten stops. I believe the dynamic range measurements were based on jpegs. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In all fairness though, he does point out that this isn't going > to be an issue for anything smaller than an A3 print, and that > if you shoot RAW you don't see any of the problems. > > The one area I was a little concerned about was the seemingly > low dynamic range in comparison to the competition. > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:22:08PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Once again, Phil gets hung up on Pentax's modest in-camera sharpening of > jpegs. I guess that's because it's easy to see when you pixel peep. I still > haven't shot a single jpeg with either this camera or my Ds (which I used for > three years) and may never do so. Thus it doesn't affect me. > > Paul > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > From: "Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Hello, > > > > > > For the few of you who didn't know this yet: > > > http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk10d/ > > > > > > Highly recommended (just) > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Alex Sarbu > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
