They are indeed. Which makes them irrelevant to anyone who shoots RAW. -Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In regard to dynamic range, he also pointed out that by tweaking a RAW he got > ten stops. I believe the dynamic range measurements were based on jpegs. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>In all fairness though, he does point out that this isn't going >>to be an issue for anything smaller than an A3 print, and that >>if you shoot RAW you don't see any of the problems. >> >>The one area I was a little concerned about was the seemingly >>low dynamic range in comparison to the competition. >> >>On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:22:08PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>>Once again, Phil gets hung up on Pentax's modest in-camera sharpening of >> >>jpegs. I guess that's because it's easy to see when you pixel peep. I still >>haven't shot a single jpeg with either this camera or my Ds (which I used for >>three years) and may never do so. Thus it doesn't affect me. >> >>>Paul >>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >>>From: "Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>For the few of you who didn't know this yet: >>>>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk10d/ >>>> >>>>Highly recommended (just) >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Best regards, >>>>Alex Sarbu >>>> >>>>-- >>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>[email protected] >>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
