elucidate please. If the instant results from raw output as as good as the jpegs the camera also puts out, then they must not be doing anything to tweek or optimized the raw data in the in-camera conversions to jpeg, no?
jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Davis Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 2:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: K10D review online Ditto! J --- Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that some of these diehard RAW users may be forgetting that > > one of the biggest "features" of any digtal camera is for instant > > results on the output. If you have to go spend a lot of time > tweeking > > each one of RAW images in photoshop, that good "feature" is lost. > > jco > > You can get perfectly good (by comparison with JPEG) instant results > on the output with raw as well. > > Bob > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
