On 16/12/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed: >But isnt the purpose of using the jpeg output >option of the camera so you can just go >straight to a print lab and print the jpegs >without having to do any digital processing >of the images on a PC or laptop? It sounds >like you cant do RAW and get instant **USABLE** >results which is what I meant.
When I shoot jpeg (not on a Pentax obviously) I don't just pop them across onto the printer. I do post-processing. I've got it down to a fast and efficient method. I do RAW as well, but to be honest for anything less than best quality print, jpeg is more than adequate. The only thing that puts RAW a peg or two above jpeg for me is the exposure latitude. Otherwise, I'd shoot jpeg all the time. I'll bring a selection of prints to GFM and defy anyone to to identify jpeg versus RAW originals... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
