Tom If i listened and actually believed all camera reviews on the net, i would have ZERO Dslr's instead of seven.
I make MY mind up by actually going out and spending my $1000or what ever, and see for my self. Most camera stores i deal with have a 14 day return if i find the product unsatisfactory. Unfortunatly my problems with the D2H, started on day 15. Dave Quoting Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Tom, > > Sorry, but I'm just tired of your constant drumbeating that there is > something wrong with the K10D. I'm sure it has many faults, but is > also giving many us enjoyment to use it. Can't you see that and stop > calling us names for praising Pentax. > > You should assume that we can all read here, and that we can read the > reviews if we so desire. Some of us have taken it one step further, > from reading to DOING with the camera and draw our positive experience > from that. > > Regards, Bob S. > > On 12/15/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Many of the people on this stinking PDML are not qualified. They have a >> narcissistic relationship with the Pentax brand. Nor do they actually LOOK >> at the output they get. >> >> A good 50% of the photos displayed here are nothing more than stinking >> street shots of homeless people or mere snapshots with very little if any >> consideration given to composition. Don't tell me you or all most anyone >> that posts here is qualified to give anything nore than a subjective, >> unscientific review. Some are... but don't criticize me because I comment on >> one, if not the most exhaustive review available. If you have something that >> meets a higher scientific standard, than the review I commented on, then I >> invite you to present it and I'll look at it with an open mind. >> >> Bob, I am qualified to say what I said, because I qualified my statements by >> saying I was disappointed in the *results of the review*, not my own >> personal review of the camera. Do you require me to spend close to a $1000 >> to expess an opinion on a review? >> >> It's a fact that many people consult reviews, consider 2nd or 3rd party >> opinions and results, because they do not have the time, ability, or desire >> to spend the time >> >> >> Tom C. >> >> >> >> >> >From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> >Subject: Re: K10D review online >> >Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:21:23 -0600 >> > >> >Tom, >> >YOU Haven't GOT the F*cking Camera and all you can say is negative >> >things based on what you've managed to scrounge up on the internet. >> >GIVE IT A REST... You're not qualified to say anything about the >> >K10D. >> >Regards, Bob S. >> > >> > >> >On 12/15/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > It's amazing that you're amazed really. Hey this reminds me of the >> >title of >> > > my favorite song... >> > > >> > > I forthrightly acknowledged that I do not have a K10D, so what is the >> >point >> > > of your redundant restatement of it? >> > > >> > > I am disappointed that a reviewer with far more photogrpahic and >> >technical >> > > knowledge than myself, along with far more capacity to perform at least >> > > pseduo-scientific tests, finds that the camera (at least his sample of >> >it) >> > > is nothing really special compared to the competition in the way we were >> > > lead to believe it would stand out, which was greater dynamic range. >> > > >> > > Tom C. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> > > >Subject: Re: K10D review online >> > > >Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:56:51 -0800 >> > > > >> > > >It's amazing how you can be disappointed with something that you have >> > > >absolutely no experience using. Are you always disappointed with >> > > >life? Try the alternatives ... >> > > > >> > > >G >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Tom C wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > ... While I don't have the camera in hand, I'm very disappointed >> > > > > with the >> > > > > advertising hype regarding both the 22-bit and the PRIME engine. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >-- >> > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> > > >[email protected] >> > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> > > [email protected] >> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > >> > >> >-- >> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >[email protected] >> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
