Oh God, another one. When you have used your camera for a couple of months, and fully understood how it works, then please report your problems. As it is, most problems reported so far have been by people who were doing something wrong.
John On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:24:31 -0000, J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "The sky is falling, the sky is falling!" cried Chicken Little. >> or so goes the children's tale. >> >> I got tired of listening to all these 'nervious nellies'. >> I got tired of looking at movies of shaking sensors. >> I've got the sensor cleaner turned off, so I don't feel any shaking, >> or more specifically any shake reduction on the K10D. >> >> So is it working or not? I shot a test this morning, see below... >> I used the K10D and DA16-45mm at F4 and 1/8th of a second. >> >> http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/ShakeReductionPentaxK10D >> >> The bubbles in the water are much sharper with SR On. >> >> Now think about the amount of movement the sensor did. >> Not very much! No wonder I can't feel anything. >> >> Do us all a favor and test your results before you whine. > > > I take offence at this. No need to be a nasty b*tch thanks very much. > My > shake reduction sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. This has been > bourne out by both watching the sensor move (or not) AND by the > photographic > results. Having said that, I love the camera and SR is not that > important > to me, so the sky is NOT falling, it just appears that the occasional > unit > has glitches...which is to be expected with a new model. > > It is a FACT that my SR is intermittant in its operation. I wish that > wasn't the case, but I'm loathe to send it away for rectification as I > don't > want to be without the camera. > > James > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
